Urban gardens and institutional fences: The case of communal gardens in Turin

Nadia Tecco, Federico Coppola, Francesco Sottile, Cristiana Peano


Urban gardens take on different forms and meanings, which vary depending on the socio-economic context where they located/used and how it evolves over time. This makes a garden comparable to a micro-social ecosystem, different from other gardens and ever changing. As with every social-ecosystem resulting from a territorialisation process, there is a certain degree of social inertia that makes it difficult for outsiders with new motivations and demanding new spaces to enter into the “garden ecosystem”. Drawing on existing literature and fieldwork in two urban communal gardens in Turin, the paper is mainly concerned with the spatiotemporal dimension of urban gardening, with a special focus on governance aspects. In particular, the article offers insights about the involvement of the governance process in the dynamics of urban allotment gardens and looks at the impact of regulations. Despite being areas with a limited extension, the complex nature of the structural coupling of the relationship among gardeners and the assigned allotment, makes it clear that urban garden management is far from being unproblematic. The attempt to govern and manage the phenomenon by the local government and promoting associations often represents a real challenge in terms of adaptability and response to a phenomenon in constant evolution and fully inserted in the urban transition.  This is a process characterized, on the one hand, by internal, conservative resistance and, on the other hand, by pressures asking for social change and innovation from the outside. In an era of urban agriculture renaissance, both aspects are relevant factors to keep in mind to face the rising demand from new people for cultivating urban spaces. These aspects have not been sufficiently considered in the governance practices or in the reflections of the scientific community.

Key words: Urban gardening, Urban agriculture, Adaptive governance, Urban transition, Urban ecology, Communal gardens

Data of the article

First received : 11 April 2017| Last revision received : 4 June 2017
Accepted : 8 June 2017 | Published online : 20 June 2017
URN: nbn:de:hebis: 34-2017060852594

Full Text:



Bagnasco, A. (1986).Torino. Un profilo sociologico. Torino: Einaudi.

Casey, E. S. (2001). Between geography and philosophy: What does it mean to be in the place-world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 683–693.

Chan, J., DuBois, B., & Tidball, K. G. (2015). Refuges of local resilience: Community gardens in post-Sandy New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 625–635. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005

Classens, M. (2014). The nature of urban gardens: Toward a political ecology of urban agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(2), 229–239. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9540-4

Crouch, D. (2016). Preface. In Bell, S., Fox-Kämper, R., Keshavarz, N., Benson, M., Caputo, S., Noori S., & Voigt A. (Eds.), Urban Allotment Gardens in Europe (pp. 31-33). New York, NY: Routledge.

D’Abundo, M. L., & Carden, A. M. (2008). “Growing Wellness”: The Possibility of Promoting Collective Wellness through Community Garden Education Programs. Community Development, 39(March), 83–94. http://doi.org/10.1080/15575330809489660

Duchemin, E., Wegmuller, F., Legault, A. M. (2009). Urban agriculture: multi-dimensional tools for social development in poor neighbourhoods, Field Actions Science Reports[Online], 1. http://factsreports.revues.org/113

Glover, T. D., Shinew, K., & Parry, D. (2005). Association, sociability, and civic culture: The democratic effect of community gardening. Leisure Sciences, 27(1), 75–92. http://doi.org/10.1080/01490400590886060

Guitart, D., Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2012). Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), 364–373. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007

Ioannou, B., Moran, N., Sondermann, M., Certomà C., & Hardman M. (2016). Grassroots gardening movements: Towards cooperative forms of green urban development? In Bell, S., Fox-Kämper, R., Keshavarz, N., Benson, M., Caputo, S., Noori S., & Voigt A. (Eds.), Urban Allotment Gardens in Europe (pp. 127-149). New York, NY: Routledge.

Luhmann, N. (1986). The Autopoiesis of Social Systems. In F. Geyer & J. Van d. Zeuwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems (pp. 172-192). London: Sage.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Mela, A. (2011). Turin: The long transition, space, society. In Brizzi M. & Sabini M. (Eds.), The New Turin (pp. 11-24). Firenze: Alinea Editrice.

Mingers, J. (2002). Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s social theory. Sociological Review, 50(2), 278–299.

Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 203–225. http://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507087647

Nahmías, P., & Le Caro, Y. (2012). Pour une définition de l’agriculture urbaine: réciprocité fonctionnelle et diversité des formes spatiales. Environnement Urbain, 6(March), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.7202/1013709ar

Odum, P. E. (1983). Basic Ecology. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.

Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (Vol. 1). Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Seidl D. (2005). Organisational Identity and Self-Transformation: An Autopoietic Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Tidball, K. G., Weinstein, E. D. & Krasny, M. E. (2014). Synthesis and conclusion: Applying greening in red zones. In Tidball, K.G. & Krasny, M.E. (Eds.) Greening in the Red Zone (pp. 451-486). Dordrecht: Springer.

Tornaghi, C. (2014). Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 551–567. http://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512542


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments




 Google Scholar H5 index 5 


The contributions of the peer reviewers for the journal are acknowledged in the 


Sponsoring Organisations

Logo Agrarekologie Uni Kassel